Hippocampal Interictal Discharges During Encoding Impair Novelty Preference in Patients with Left Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
Abstract number :
V.093
Submission category :
11. Behavior/Neuropsychology/Language / 11A. Adult
Year :
2021
Submission ID :
1826675
Source :
www.aesnet.org
Presentation date :
12/9/2021 12:00:00 PM
Published date :
Nov 22, 2021, 06:55 AM
Authors :
Beth Leeman-Markowski, MD, MA, MMSc - New York University Langone Health, VA New York Harbor Healthcare System; Richard Hardstone - New York University Langone Health; Benjamin Cowen - New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Werner Doyle - New York University Langone Health; Patricia Dugan - New York University Langone Health; Adeen Flinker - New York University Langone Health; Daniel Friedman - New York University Langone Health; Ivan Selesnick - New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Binhuan Wang - New York University Langone Health, VA New York Harbor Healthcare System; Kimford Meador - Stanford University School of Medicine; Orrin Devinsky - New York University Langone Health
Rationale: Hippocampal interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) can disrupt memory task performance. While a negative impact of IEDs during memory retrieval has been demonstrated in multiple studies, the effect of IEDs during encoding is unclear. IED effects may be task-dependent, and traditional list learning paradigms may be limited by poor performance. The present study examines the effects of IEDs during the Visual Paired Comparison Task (VPCT). This task is based on novelty preference, which reflects the natural tendency to fixate on novel items as opposed to previously viewed items. A greater percentage of time viewing a novel item compared to a previously studied item is an implicit indication of recognition memory for the “old” item, providing a continuous outcome measure of memory performance.
Methods: Subjects with medically refractory focal-onset epilepsy completed the VPCT during intracranial EEG recordings with left hippocampal depth electrodes placed for clinical purposes. The task consisted of an encoding phase in which identical pictures were displayed side-by-side for 5 seconds, followed by a 2- or 30-second delay, after which a recognition trial was administered (Figure 1). This sequence was repeated 20 or 40 times with different stimuli, depending on subjects’ fatigue and time constraints. Using infrared-based eye tracking, a “novelty preference score” was calculated (fixation timenew/fixation timenew+old). IEDs were identified by an automated algorithm (Janca et al., Brain Topogr, 2015; 28:172–83). The relationships between IED counts during encoding, maintenance, and recognition phases and novelty preference scores were determined using an autoregressive generalized estimating equation (GEE). A secondary model assessed the effect of IED timing within the encoding period, by dividing the encoding period into one-second duration bins.
Results: Three adults participated in the study (2 male, 1 female, right-handed), all with seizure onset zones involving the left temporal lobe. Mean novelty preference was 65.4% (sd 24%). A total of 100 trials were completed across subjects; 34, 68, and 37 trials had IEDs during encoding, maintenance, and recognition periods, respectively. IEDs during encoding had a negative impact on novelty preference score (β=-0.016, p=0.003), while no significant effects of IEDs during maintenance or recognition were evident. Significant negative associations with novelty preference score were seen for IEDs at time bins 0-1, 2-3, 3-4, and 4-5 seconds during encoding (p-values< 0.001).
Behavior