Abstracts

Learning to Generalize Seizure Forecasts

Abstract number : 3.175
Submission category : 3. Neurophysiology / 3G. Computational Analysis & Modeling of EEG
Year : 2021
Submission ID : 1826430
Source : www.aesnet.org
Presentation date : 12/6/2021 12:00:00 PM
Published date : Nov 22, 2021, 06:54 AM

Authors :
Marc Grau Leguia, PhD - Inselspital Bern,; Maxime Baud - Department of Neurology - Inselspital Bern and Wyss Center for Bio- and Neuro-technology; Timothée Proix - Department of Basic Neurosciences - University of Geneva; Vikram Rao - Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences - University of California; Thomas Tcheng - NeuroPace, Inc.

Rationale: Epilepsy, one of the most common neurological disorders, is characterized by spontaneous seizures that seem to occur randomly. Yet, studies using chronic electroencephalography (cEEG) have revealed multi-day (multidien) cycles of recorded brain epileptic activity that correlate with patient-reported seizures. In our earlier work (JAMA neurology 78 (4), 2021), we found that these multidien periodicities center around four peaks that are shared across patients: 7, 15, 20, and 30 days. However, independent of these individual “seizure chronotypes,” seizures consistently occur during the rising phase of multidien cycles, when epileptic brain activity increases over days. This shared phenomenon may bear information for forecasting seizures, even in the absence of any knowledge about patterns of seizure timing in a given patient. To test this rigorously, we trained algorithms on the data taken from a subset of patients, and forecasted seizures in other, previously unseen patients.

Methods: We used retrospective long-term cEEG and seizure diary data from 160 participants in the RNS System clinical trials, and extracted information about the phase of their multidien cycles to forecast seizures solely on this basis. We applied (1) mixed-effects generalized linear models (GLM) and (2) recurrent neural networks (RNN) to model the occurrences of seizures across patients and derived the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to assess their relative performance, which we also compared to results obtained from GLM models that were individually trained.

Results: Using either mixed-effects GLM or RNN, we generated models that forecasted seizures above chance in 55 and 63% of new, previously unseen subjects with a median predictive power of AUC = 0.65 or 0.68, respectively. Moreover, the average AUCs were only slightly below that of models that were individually trained (AUC = 0.70) (The Lancet neurology 20 (2), 2021).

Conclusions: We demonstrate that the high prevalence and robustness of shared patterns of seizure cycles at the multidien timescale can support a generalizable forecasting model. This makes it possible to forecast seizures above chance in patients unknown to an algorithm. These findings suggest that seizure forecasting based on multidien cycles of epileptic brain activity may have broad applicability in patients with epilepsy. However, prospective studies are needed to fully assess the accuracy of generalizable GLM or RNN models for forecasting seizures in clinical practice.

Funding: Please list any funding that was received in support of this abstract.: none.

Neurophysiology