Refining Epileptogenic High-frequency Oscillations Using Deep Learning: A Reverse Engineering Approach
Abstract number :
2.059
Submission category :
3. Neurophysiology / 3G. Computational Analysis & Modeling of EEG
Year :
2021
Submission ID :
1825757
Source :
www.aesnet.org
Presentation date :
12/5/2021 12:00:00 PM
Published date :
Nov 22, 2021, 06:50 AM
Authors :
Hiroki Nariai, MD, PhD, MS - UCLA; Yipeng Zhang, MS - Electrical and Computer Engineering - UCLA; Qiujing Lu, MS - Electrical and Computer Engineering - UCLA; Tonmoy Monsoor, MS - Electrical and Computer Engineering - UCLA; Shaun Hussain, MD, MS - Pediatrics - UCLA; Joe Qiao, PhD - Radiology - UCLA; Noriko Salamon, MD, PhD - Radiology - UCLA; Aria Fallah, MD, MS - Neurosurgery - UCLA; Myung Shin Sim, PhD - Medicine - UCLA; Eishi Asano, MD, PhD, MS - Pediatrics and Neurology - Wayne State University; Raman Sankar, MD, PhD - Pediatrics and Neurology - UCLA; Richard Staba, PhD - Neurology - UCLA; Jerome Engel, MD, PhD - Neurology, Neurobiology, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, and the Brain Research Institute - UCLA; William Speier, PhD - Radiological Sciences and Bioengineering - UCLA; Vwani Roychowdhury, PhD - Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, UCLA
Rationale: Intracranially-recorded interictal high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) have been proposed as a promising spatial biomarker of the epileptogenic zone. However, visual verification of HFOs is time-consuming and exhibits poor inter-rater reliability. Furthermore, no method is currently available to distinguish HFOs generated from the epileptogenic zone (epileptogenic HFOs: eHFOs) from those generated from other areas (non-epileptogenic HFOs: non-eHFOs).
Methods: To address these issues, we constructed a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm (Fig.1) using HFO events from chronic intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG) data via subdural grids from 19 children with medication-resistant neocortical epilepsy to: 1) replicate human expert annotation of artifacts and HFOs with or without spikes, and 2) discover eHFOs by designing a novel weakly supervised model (HFOs from the resected brain regions are initially labeled as eHFOs, and those from the preserved brain regions as non-eHFOs). The “purification power” of DL is then used to automatically relabel the HFOs to distill eHFOs.
Results: Using 12,958 annotated HFO events from 19 patients, the model achieved 96.3% accuracy on artifact detection (F1 score = 96.8%) and 86.5% accuracy on classifying HFOs with or without spikes (F1 score = 80.8%) using patient-wise cross-validation. Based on the DL-based algorithm trained from 84,602 HFO events from nine patients who achieved seizure-freedom after resection, the majority of such DL-discovered eHFOs were found to be expert annotated HFOs with spikes (78.6%, p < 0.001). While the resection ratio of detected HFOs (number of resected HFOs/number of detected HFOs) did not correlate significantly with post-operative seizure freedom (the area under the curve [AUC]=0.76, p=0.06), the resection ratio of eHFOs positively correlated with post-operative seizure freedom (AUC=0.87, p=0.01). We discovered that the eHFOs had a higher signal intensity associated with ripple (80-250 Hz) and fast ripple (250-500 Hz) bands at the HFO onset and with a lower frequency band throughout the event time window (the inverted T-shaped), compared to non-eHFOs (Fig.2). We then designed perturbations on the input of the trained model for non-eHFOs to determine the model’s decision-making logic. The model probability significantly increased towards eHFOs by the artificial introduction of higher signal intensity in the inverted T-shaped frequency bands (mean probability increase: 0.285, p < 0.001), and by the artificial insertion of spike-like signals into the time domain (mean probability increase: 0.452, p < 0.001).
Neurophysiology