Abstracts

RELATIVE BIOAVAILABILITY OF CLOBAZAM ORAL SUSPENSION AFTER A SINGLE 20-MG DOSE IN HEALTHY STUDY VOLUNTEERS

Abstract number : 1.235
Submission category : 7. Antiepileptic Drugs
Year : 2012
Submission ID : 15814
Source : www.aesnet.org
Presentation date : 11/30/2012 12:00:00 AM
Published date : Sep 6, 2012, 12:16 PM

Authors :
E. Sales, A. Juan, I. Bekersky, D. Tolbert

Rationale: Clobazam 5-, 10-, and 20-mg tablets are available as adjunctive therapy for adult and pediatric patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). For LGS patients who have difficulty swallowing tablets, Lundbeck LLC has developed an oral suspension formulation of clobazam. As a suspension formulation is a new dosage form, we conducted a single-dose bioavailability study vs. the commercial tablet formulation. Methods: This Phase I study was a randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study investigating the relative bioavailability, safety and tolerability of oral suspension vs. oral tablets following a single 20-mg dose to healthy male and female study participants (N=30). Doses were administered on Days 1 and 15. Each administration was separated by a washout period of 14 days. The pharmacokinetic profiles of clobazam and N-desmethylclobazam (N-CLB) were obtained from serial plasma concentrations during 312 hours post-doses. The relative bioavailability of suspension compared with that of a clobazam tablet was evaluated using bioequivalence criteria: the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the ratios of the oral suspension to the oral tablet for the pharmacokinetic parameters of AUC0-inf and Cmax for clobazam were contained within the interval from 0.80 to 1.25. Results: The suspension/tablet ratio point estimate and 90% CIs for CLB were: Cmax = 1.19 (1.12 to 1.27); AUC0-last = 0.997 (0.977 to 1.02); and AUC0-inf = 0.995 (0.976 to 1.01). Thus, bioequivalence criteria were met for AUC0-last and AUC0-inf. However, for Cmax, the upper boundary of the 90% CI was just outside the bioequivalence limit of 1.25. All other parameters of exposure were similar. The slight increase observed in Cmax was a consequence of the physicochemical properties of the suspension dosage form (i.e., a suspension is designed to deliver the drug faster than a tablet) and were not considered clinically meaningful, as two dissimilar dosage forms were compared. Conclusions: The 20-mg clobazam oral suspension was functionally bioequivalent to 20-mg commercial tablets. Clobazam has a wide therapeutic window and is intended for long-term administration for patients with chronic LGS. Thus, the slight increase in Cmax is clinically insignificant. There were no clinically relevant differences in safety and tolerability between the two formulations.
Antiepileptic Drugs