Sensitivity of Depth Versus Strip Electrodes in the Detection of Hippocampal Ictal Onsets by the RNS[trade] Responsive Neurostimulator
Abstract number :
1.095
Submission category :
Clinical Neurophysiology-Brain Stimulation
Year :
2006
Submission ID :
6229
Source :
www.aesnet.org
Presentation date :
12/1/2006 12:00:00 AM
Published date :
Nov 30, 2006, 06:00 AM
Authors :
1Robert R. Goodman, 2Gregory Bergey, 3Gregory Worrell, 4David Chabolla, 5Joeseph Drazkowski, 6Douglas Labar, 7Robert Duckrow, 8Anthony Murro, 9Michael Smith
Patients diagnosed with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) were implanted with the RNS[trade] responsive neurostimulator as part of a larger multicenter feasibility study to assess safety and potential efficacy. This analysis examines the onset patterns and seizure frequency associated with lead type., 20 of 65 subjects enrolled in an RNS Investigation were diagnosed with intractable MTLE and are evaluated here. Hippocampal depth and/or temporal subdural leads were implanted chronically to monitor electrographic activity from and deliver stimulation to the presumed seizure onset region(s). Onset patterns were assessed via review of electrographic activity stored by the RNS; clinical response was evaluated by comparing seizure count over the most recent 84 days (post-implant) to an 84-day pre-implant baseline., Follow-up was 6 months to 2 years. There were no serious, unanticipated device-related adverse events.[table1]In most subjects implanted unilaterally, the earliest onsets were on the depth lead except in 2 cases, the onset appeared earlier in the subtemporal strip with rapid spread to the depth. In the bilateral cases, earliest onsets were observed on both leads.
Eighty percent of subjects had at least one depth lead. The most common onset patterns were alpha/beta (48% of depth onsets, 69% of strip onsets), 1-2 Hz spiking (44% of depth and 23% of strip onsets) and low-voltage fast activity (8% of depth and strip onsets)., Although the sample size of subjects with intractable MTLE is small, detection and stimulation provided by depth lead(s) was associated with a greater reduction in seizures than with strip electrodes alone. Depth electrodes may also be more sensitive than strip electrodes in detecting ictal spiking., (Supported by NeuroPace, Inc.)
Neurophysiology